Type your keyword...

Cookies & Privacy

We use cookies to improve your browsing experience, analyze website traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use Shivamlekh News, you agree to our use of cookies, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.
Contact Us , About Us , Grievance Redressal Policy , Cookie Policy , Correction Policy , Editorial Policy , Disclaimer , Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Delhi Metro CISF Jawan Accused of Taking Woman’s Photo, Viral Video Sparks Safety Debate

Delhi Metro News : At around 1:00 AM on the night of August 15-16, an incident on Delhi Metro’s Yellow Line has raised serious questions about women’s privacy and safety in public places. Near AIIMS Metro Station, a CISF uniformed personnel was allegedly accused of secretly taking photographs of a female passenger without her consent. Some people also alleged that when the woman confronted the CISF personnel, he allegedly took out his service pistol and pointed it at them. The commotion inside the coach was captured on video by passengers, and the viral video has now sparked a fresh debate over the safety of women and the security of the public transport system in the national capital. The alleged incident has also raised questions about the credibility of uniformed security personnel. So, what exactly happened during the controversy? Let’s understand the incident in detail.

On the night of August 15-16, a woman was travelling in a train near AIIMS Metro Station. A CISF ASI in uniform was also present in the same coach. During the journey, the woman suddenly felt that the personnel was secretly taking her photographs using his phone.

The woman immediately asked the personnel why he was taking her photographs. The personnel initially denied the allegation and said that he had not taken any photograph. However, when fellow passengers intervened and checked his phone, they allegedly found photographs of the woman in his gallery.

The woman demanded that he hand over the phone and delete the photographs. However, the personnel refused to hand over his phone. Following this, the argument inside the coach escalated and eventually turned into pushing and a confrontation involving the personnel’s collar.

During the incident, some passengers alleged that the personnel took out his service pistol and pointed it towards them. However, the Metro Police denied this claim and stated that there was no incident involving the pointing of a firearm. Nothing of this sort can be clearly seen in the viral video either.

Passengers recorded the incident on their mobile phone cameras, and the video has now gone viral on social media.

The female passenger’s direct allegation was that the CISF personnel, who was travelling in uniform, took her photographs inside the moving metro without her consent. An allegation of this nature against a security personnel responsible for protecting passengers is extremely serious.

During the initial argument, the personnel denied the allegation and said that he had not taken any photographs. After this, nearby passengers intervened. They claimed that several photographs of the woman were found in the phone gallery when it was checked. However, this claim has been made by passengers present at the spot and has not yet been officially confirmed.

After the incident, the phone was taken into possession by senior CISF officials, and an investigation is underway.

This is not merely a question of one personnel’s behaviour; it also raises questions about credibility and accountability. When an Assistant Sub-Inspector deployed for security in the Delhi Metro, whose responsibility is to protect passengers, is accused of breaching a woman’s privacy, questions are naturally raised about the security system and its accountability.

At present, these remain serious allegations, and the investigation is ongoing. The woman has not yet filed a formal written complaint with the police. Whether photographs of the woman were actually found on the phone will become clear only after the investigation is completed.

Section 77 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, or BNS, deals with voyeurism. Taking photographs of a woman without her consent may constitute an offence in certain circumstances.

Now, let us understand how the situation that night escalated from an argument and a confrontation over the alleged photographs to the claim of a service pistol being pointed.

When the woman raised her voice inside the coach, nearby passengers also immediately became involved in the argument. The passengers collectively demanded that the personnel delete the photographs and show them his phone.

However, when the personnel clearly refused to hand over the phone, the situation became even more tense. As the argument became heated, the personnel allegedly tried to leave the coach after feeling surrounded.

However, passengers blocked his way, and the situation eventually turned into pushing and shoving.

During the scuffle, some passengers allegedly grabbed the personnel by his collar and prevented him from leaving the coach.

Meanwhile, the claim that the service pistol was taken out also emerged, leading to two completely different versions of the incident.

Some passengers present inside the coach alleged that just before getting off at the platform, the personnel took out his service pistol and pointed it towards the passengers.

On the other hand, the police completely denied this allegation and said that there was no incident involving the firearm being taken out or pointed at anyone. The viral video also does not show any clear incident of the pistol being taken out.

At present, both versions are part of the official investigation, and the exact truth is expected to emerge after the departmental inquiry is completed.

It is also important to understand the limitations of the viral video circulating on social media. The video available on the internet shows only a small portion of the entire incident. What happened before the camera started recording and how the situation was handled after the video ended are not captured in the clip.

Therefore, a single viral video cannot be considered the complete truth of the entire incident.

Following the incident, the Delhi Metro Police and CISF took action. At around 12:40 AM, the Delhi Metro Police received a PCR call. After receiving the information, police officials reached the spot and took the CISF ASI into their custody.

Considering the seriousness of the matter, the personnel was subsequently handed over to senior CISF officials.

As soon as the matter came to light, CISF also took action. The accused personnel was suspended with immediate effect, and a detailed departmental inquiry was ordered against him.

CISF Delhi Metro issued a statement on its official social media handle, saying that the matter was being taken very seriously and that any kind of indiscipline or misconduct would not be tolerated.

However, another important aspect of the case is that the female passenger has not filed a formal written complaint with the police. Therefore, according to the police, no criminal FIR has been registered so far.

Further legal action will depend on the formal complaint and the facts that emerge during the investigation.

At present, the personnel remains suspended, and the departmental inquiry is ongoing. His mobile phone is also being examined to verify facts related to the incident.

Now, let us discuss some of the basic questions raised by this entire incident—questions directly related to the security system, accountability of uniformed personnel and public trust.

The first question is: What should a citizen do if their privacy is violated?

In this case, passengers themselves stepped forward to object and even grabbed the personnel by his collar. Legally, ordinary citizens cannot engage in physical confrontation with a security force personnel.

But another question also arises: If the passengers had not intervened that night, would the personnel have been able to leave the scene?

When the allegation itself is against a uniformed security personnel, the ease and effectiveness of immediately filing a complaint and getting assistance at the spot becomes a major concern.

Millions of people travel on the Delhi Metro every day, and CISF is responsible for security. Therefore, public trust in the CISF uniform is extremely important.

When a uniformed personnel is accused of breaching a woman’s privacy, the impact is not limited to the trust of that particular woman; it also affects confidence in the entire system.

According to Delhi Metro Rail Corporation, or DMRC, rules, professional photography, videography or taking photographs of another passenger without their consent inside the Metro premises or train is restricted without the required permission. Such actions can raise serious concerns regarding passenger privacy and safety.

The CISF service conduct rules are also an important aspect in such matters. For a uniformed officer, discipline, dignity and the safety of citizens are expected to remain among the highest priorities while performing duties or appearing in public.

If a personnel deployed on duty is found to have taken photographs of passengers in violation of applicable rules, it may be treated as misconduct under the relevant service provisions.

Depending on the findings of the inquiry, disciplinary action can range from suspension to termination in accordance with applicable rules.

In a vast network like the Delhi Metro, despite CCTV cameras and multiple security protocols, if a woman has to confront a security personnel herself over an alleged privacy violation, then questions are raised not only about one incident but about the larger security and accountability system.

This incident is also significant from the perspective of Delhi NCR News, Delhi NCR News Today, and Delhi NCR News in Hindi, as it is directly connected with passenger safety, women’s privacy and public trust in the Delhi Metro security system.

CISF jawan accused of taking a woman's photo video goes viral — the viral video related to the incident is being widely discussed on social media. However, the complete facts of the case will become clear only after the departmental inquiry and official investigation are completed.